the traveler's resource guide to festivals & filmsa FestivalTravelNetwork.com site part of Insider Media llc.
The late Claude Sautet was an accomplished director who emerged alongside the celebrated French nouvelle vague -- new wave -- in the late'60s, early '70s. His auteurist credentials received an implicit endorsement in François Truffaut's favorable review of Vincent, François, Paul and the others. Truffaut was one of the most exacting critics who had written for Cahiers du cinèma — but he also used Sautet as a script-doctor on his own films.
The long overdue retrospective of Sautet's work -- titled Claude Sautet: The Things of Life -- at the Film Society of Lincoln Center (running from August 1st - 9th, 2012), affords audiences an exciting opportunity to re-evaluate the impressive achievements of a director who, at the very least, was an exquisite craftsman until his death in Paris on July 22nd, 2000, at the age of 76.
From 1970, The Things of Life/Les choses de la vie inaugurated many of the director's most enduring and significant collaborations -- most of which are included in this series. It was sensitively scripted by Jean-Loup Dabadie, beautifully photographed in color by the distinguished cinematographer Jean Boffety and brilliantly scored by Philippe Sarde — his first feature — all of whom went on to work with Sautet multiple times.
The film also greatly benefits from a strong cast. In it star two of the French cinema's most extraordinary talents, both of whom were leads in several subsequent Sautet works: Michel Piccoli, one of the subtlest of French actors, and the lovely, understatedly glamorous, Romy Schneider. The attractive Lea Massari, who is something of a legend in her own right, is also memorable in a supporting role.
Most notable for an intricate editing style which recalls similar, contemporaneous approaches in films by Alain Resnais, Nicholas Roeg, and Richard Lester, The Things of Life tells of Pierre (Piccoli) a successful highway builder who ends up in a deadly auto crash. Seriously hurt, he lies there waiting for the ambulance and possibly death, while the film recalls his past in flashbacks -- reviewing his loves and relationships.
This associative construction is complemented by an intelligent deployment of telephoto that serves as a vehicle for the subjective examination of the narrative concept. Although this is is a moving and worthwhile work, I have reservations about whether it ultimately transcends a certain insubstantiality as envisioned here — Sautet was to attain even greater depths in later films.
The print of The Things of Life being screened is an old one — a French import — with good color, although not without disappointingly considerable dirt and some wear.
Claude Sautet: The Things of LifeAugust 1st - 9th, 2012
Film Society of Lincoln CenterWalter Reade Theatre165 West 65th StreetNew York, NY 10023
Making your own film can be pretty scary. Selling and distributing it can also be just as Herculean a task. Many indie filmmakers look to the internet now to self-distribute and release their films, but even that world has its own pitfalls. Lucky for you, a unique mix of filmmakers want to help you navigate that world.
On Wednesday, August 8, 2012 at the Wix Lounge (10 West 18th Street 2nd floor), four panelists, moderated by Film Festival Traveler’s own Brad Balfour, will discuss self-releasing a film online, and reaching your audience. This is part of Film 2.0: The Digital (R)evolution, a series of three talks about how the internet effects the film industry in conjunction with the Beneath the Earth Film Festival.
The panelists are:
This event is not only a great opportunity to learn from experienced members of the online indie film community, but to also meet and network with your peers. And since it’s at a lounge you can at the very least get a drink out of the whole affair.
Film 2.0: The Digital (R)evolution Building An Audience August 8, 2012
Wix Lounge 10 West 18th Street 2nd floor New York, NY 10011
From August 9th to September 1st, 2012, Gallery1988 NY Pop-Up Store (64 Gansevoort Street) will pay tribute to the undeniable charm of video-store era cult movies with Crazy 4 Cult: NEW YORK.
Going to the video store used to be a ritualistic trek to a valley of rack after rack of tantalizing box-art with promises of so many cheap thrills and unexpected delights.
I still remember the time when the box for John Water's twadry and disgusting Pink Flamingos first caught my eye at a local video store. These movies, cheap and tawdry to some, had an undeniable allure to them, sometimes coupled with a sense of reverent mysticism.
The Crazy 4 Cult art-series has been a fixture at Gallery1988’s California locations (where they’re wrapping up on “There’s always money in the banana stand”, a display of art based on the show Arrested Development) for four years now, and this will be the first time the Crazy 4 Cult series will be conducted in New York.
To learn more, go to: http://nineteeneightyeight.com/
Crazy 4 Cult: NEW YORK August 9 – September 1, 2012
Gallery1988 NY Pop-Up Store 64 Gansevoort Street New York, NY 10014
Set in New York City soon after the Vietnam War, Taxi Driver -- directed by Martin Scorsese and written by Paul Schrader -- starred Robert De Niro as Travis Bickle and featured Jodie Foster as a child prostitute, Harvey Keitel as her pimp, and Cybill Shepherd as Bickle’s psychotic obsession.
This psycho-thriller was nominated for four Oscars, including Best Picture, and won the Palme d'Or at the 1976 Cannes Film Festival. And this week it was named Timeout's "Number One Greatest Film About New York" in its summer film issue which celebrates the 100 best movies about New York City.
The American Film Institute ranks it as the 52nd greatest American film on their AFI's 100 Years…100 Movies (10th Anniversary Edition) list. And it is considered so "culturally, historically or aesthetically" significant by the US Library of Congress that it was selected to be preserved in the National Film Registry in 1994.
Not bad for a film born out of dreams and nightmares.
When it was re-issued as a Blu-ray, a special sneak screening at the Director's Guild Theater was preceded by a remarkable tete a tete between Schrader and Scorsese discussing their ride with this groundbreaking film. It was an incredible moment in cinematic history. Their story of how this film took form and made its mark was made even more profound when they explained its unself-conscious creation.
Reffed by Scorsese associate Kent Jones, this dialogue had been consigned to history, it now deserves this text viewing since Taxi Driver will enjoy an upcoming three-night screening (August 17 - 19th, 2012) at the Museum of The Moving Image in Astoria, Queens, as part of its summer See It Big! program. Running from July 6th through September 28th, the series presents classic and contemporary films the way they're meant to be seen: on the big screen.
So it seemed like a good occasion to share this exchange.
Q: Paul, you said that the last time you and Marty were at a public event with Taxi Driver was at Cannes in 1976.
PS: Yeah, I wanted to issue a certain caveat, because Marty and I have talked about this film over the years. But the last time we were actually at the same podium together was at Cannes in '76.
In the intervening 35 years, I'm sure that we have both evolved our own mythology, which may not in fact coincide with each other, in which case I will defer to his mythology.
Q: The best place to start is where the movie began -- with the script.
PS: This script had rewritten itself. I was in a very dark place... sort of in a desperate place, and this character was starting to take over my life. I felt I had to write him so I wouldn't become him.
I was not a screenwriter at that time, I was a film critic. But I wrote this as a script rather than as a novel because I knew scripts. I had been living in my car and drifting around, and then I was sick in the hospital -- at the age of 26.
And when I was in the hospital, this metaphor occurred to me of the taxi cab, this idea of this man in this metal coffin floating through the sewers of the city, who seems to be in the middle of society but in fact is desperately alone.
In fact I think it actually worked. After I wrote the script, I drifted around the country for about six months and sort of got myself back together and came back to LA, and then through Brian [De Palma], I ran into Marty Scorsese with the script.
Q: What was it in the script that drew you to it?
MS: Brian introduced me at that time to Paul. He took me down to San Diego, I think it was, to meet. But I think he had given me the script just to read and he said, "you should do this," but I was still editing Mean Streets at the time.
PS: I don't know whether I gave it to you or Brian gave it to you.
MS: I think you gave it, but he told me about it first.
PS: And Brian in fact owns a piece of this film.
MS: He does?
PS: Yes. Because I told Julia [Phillips, producer] in order to move it from Brian to you, I gave him a little piece.
MS: Well, I read it, and the character and the precision and power of the prose was like poetry. It was so strong, the dialog, the scene descriptions, but ultimately it was truthful and honest and had many feelings that I certainly identified with later on.
I'd done much reading over the years, and a life spent at the movies in a sense, watching a lot of films. But one of the books I first read that was a strong impression on me, that I really wanted to do or to do versions of -- or other versions of other works by this author -- is Dostoevsky's Notes from the Underground.
And so this is the closest thing that I had come to. I didn't really think that literally. In other words, it took me a year or two after making the film to realize it all, I think, but it was just a visceral reaction to the power of the writing, really, and the character.
PS: I know when I got this idea, I knew there were two books I wanted to reread. I had recently read Notes from the Underground, so I reread [it]. These characters were his parents and his grandparents, and not so much characters from American movies, but really characters from literature.
MS: I was aware of Camus' The Stranger, but still for me it was more Russian in a way.
Q: The connection to Pickpocket is also a connection to Dostoevsky too.
PS: I was a film critic and I reviewed this film Pickpocket [dir. Robert Bresson]. I had never thought that I would be anything other than a film critic.
I saw this movie and I loved it and I wrote about it repeatedly, and I said "I could make a movie like that. That's just a guy in his room, then he goes around and he writes in a diary and he goes back to his room. I could do that."
And so when I finally did write a script, what was it about? It's a guy in a room writing in a diary.
Q: During the actual shooting, if I'm remembering correctly, there was a garbage strike in New York?
MS: Everything was going on in New York at the time. It was the hottest summer.
Q: Summer of '75.
MS: '75. It was a nice time, but it was an extraordinarily hard shoot. They all are, but this had a very short schedule for us.
But there was a garbage strike and apparently everything was going way downhill. It was the middle of the '70s and the [federal] government just told [New York City] to go to hell, "We're not going to bail you out."
And [the locations] you had written about, him driving up and down those areas -- Eighth Avenue was perfect between 42nd and 52nd Street. Perfect. That was our area where we shot all the time.
And the sense of violence in the city -- although that's part of my background, in a sense of where I come from in the city -- but the sense of violence in that area in the summer at night was palpable. You could feel it in the air, and it was rough at times.
PS: There were no locations in this film? [There was] no studio work there?
MS: At the end, there's an abandoned building on Columbus Avenue.
Q: Looking at the movie now, it's like an index of a lost New York. So many of the locations are gone.
PS: [Writer] Fran Lebowitz spoke to this very subject in a delightful film that Marty made, with her saying, "We built Times Square for you and if you don't like it, we'll change it."
MS: I never thought that would happen. The only instance I had of that was when we were shooting on Columbus Avenue and 89th Street in that abandoned building. All those buildings were being taken down, and there were all these stores that were getting to be built up, these kind of cooking stores, and a complete store to buy ribbons.
We shot 42nd Street. I used to go up to 42nd Street to see films if we could, but we always went up with four or five young guys. It was a horrible, horrible place. It really was miserable. It had a lot of character, but it was a miserable place. Even the night shooting there was very disturbing.
In my mind, I guess you could walk around there now, although I don't particularly like what it is now. But I must say there's nostalgia for it, unless you were a good drug addict, or whatever you wanted to do or get, you could get there.
PS: On 42nd Street they would have these phantom shows at 10 am -- did you ever go to any of those? -- like a big Hollywood movie, and they would be showing it at 10 am on 42nd Street for less. It wouldn't even be advertised.
Q: Did you go to any of those shows?
PS: Oh, yeah.
MS: Did you go alone?
PS: At 10 o'clock in the morning I did.
Q: One piece of casting in the movie is Leonard Harris as the presidential candidate.
MS: He was a TV anchorman, I believe, and commentator. Leonard had written a book called Masada Plan, and he seemed really right. Many people were suggested, but Leonard turned out to be really perfect for us.
We interviewed a lot of people, and did readings with a number [of them]. One night we met [NY mayor] John Lindsay too.
Q: How did Robert De Niro find his way into the part?
MS: We didn't have to say much to talk about it, but there was a lot of rehearsal.
PS: This is my take on it. I don't think we really talked that much about his character. I talked a little bit with Bobby, but not that much. I don't think you talked that much. I think all three of us knew exactly who this character was.
MS: Yeah, exactly.
PS: We were wired into this kid. And one of the reasons I suspect the film has an ongoing resonance is because of the serendipity of three young men in a very similar place coming together at the right time.
MS: Literally, it was unsaid. And even the scene I did in the cab with Bob, I always talk about the fact that really the whole picture is about how he holds his head and his body straight. But we did rehearsals for like two or three weeks in a hotel. I don't think there was any major rewriting of any kind.
And the reverse angle on him, from my point of view, was pretty much everything. Keep it lean.
PS: I went out to visit him on the set of [Bernardo Bertolucci's 1900 ]. We were both in Italy at the time, and he wanted me to read the script into a tape recorder. I don't know why.
But also at one point in the film he gave me a call -- I was back in Los Angeles working on another film -- and he said "We're doing this scene tomorrow and do you think Travis would say this?"
That was the last time he ever made that call, and I said "Bob, I'm in Los Angeles, I'm working on another film, you're in New York, you're wearing my boots, you're working with Marty, you're living the life. If you think he will say this, he will say this."
Q: How did you have the idea for Bernard Hermann to do the score?
MS: For me the films that I admire greatly have wonderful scores and it comes from the Hollywood tradition of film scoring -- also foreign films.
But with Mean Streets that type of filmmaking wasn't for me. I thought the score of the picture had to be created from bits and pieces that I heard in my head, that I lived with, etcetera. And in Alice Doesn't Live Here Anymore a similar thing was done.
But here, with Travis, he just never listened to music in a way I don't feel.
PS: That decision of yours is one that caught me most by surprise, and I think it's probably really part of the genius of this film. I had assumed because of Mean Streets it would all be needle drops, because you were a needle drop kind of guy.
And then when I heard Bernard Hermann was going to do it, I didn't know quite what to think of it. But history has proved it to be a truly inspired decision.
MS: He's the only one that could have taken it. It was the themes from North by Northwest, Vertigo, and even The Devil and Daniel Webster, pictures like that. Whenever I thought of a film over those years in the '60s and '70s and I'd go back and look at it, I'd say "Well the film wasn't as good, but it was the music."
Even like pictures that he made at Fox -- [such as] White Witch Doctor with Robert Mitchum and Susan Hayward -- I think the music is great. The film's not very good, but the music is.
In any event, this is the move and tone, the cab just taking us down to levels of the Inferno, taking us all the way.
PS: Was he surprised when you asked him?
MS: Yes. I met him through Dutch filmmakers in Amsterdam. They had worked with him on a picture, and I called him on the phone and I said "I really admire your work, sir. I'd love you to do the score for my new picture, it's called Taxi Driver," and he said "I don't do pictures about cabbies."
So we sent him a script and we met him in London. He especially loved the character and he loved that [Travis] ate cornflakes with the brandy, and that did it. "See, I'm all brass," he said, "All brass. All strength." And when that first cue came up, it surprised me.
PS: Even though we're involved with it, we can be objective enough to say that is a real moment. It turned out wonderfully.
Q: You weren't eating cornflakes with brandy?
PS: That's Country Priest. The wine and the bread and all that. The Catholic wine and bread becomes cornflakes and brandy. It's not that big a jump.
Q: Is it true that Merchant of Four Seasons by Fassbinder was something else that was on your minds?
PS: It was on Marty's mind, color-wise. I know because he mentioned it to me.
MS: We had a lot of trouble pulling the picture together. Michael and Julia Phillips really tried, and the combination of all of us together finally was able to pull it off, but it was pretty low budget for the time.
For a long period of time I was thinking black and white, but then it would be too pretentious. Then I really felt we would do a black and white video even, because we couldn't get the money for it.
I remember going to see the latest video films that were being made. David Hemmings had actually made some, and the quality wasn't quite really right at this point. The color was very troublesome to me. Then I said, what about the desaturated color that I use at the end of the shootout?
Moby Dick was done that way, the film that John Huston directed. He devised this color scheme with Oswald Morris which would look like whaling engravings.
But Merchant of Four Seasons, or Fassbinder -- they were showing the West German Renaissance pictures at the Carnegie Hall Cinema, and I saw two of them. One, I don't remember what it was; and the other was Merchant of Four Seasons.
I don't get a lot of them. It's way over my head -- the Fassbinder stuff, I just don't get.
But the thing about Merchant of Four Seasons [that] had a kind of brutal honesty [was] the way the camera looked at the characters, at the actors, and not necessarily the melodramatic scenes.
And I realized you could do anything, really. What I meant by that is, as long as you feel honest about, it it's an honest image.
It's like seeing a police photo, a crime scene photo. There's a certain objectivity to it. How does a crime scene photographer choose the angle? You know what I'm saying? Is he like, "This will be nice."? No, he's not going to do that. He's like "Here it is. Life, death, right here."
That's it. That was the impulse that Fassbinder's stuff gave me.
Q: You mentioned the desaturated color in the shootout. For some reason it keeps coming up as an issue about to what degree it was a choice and is it something that was imposed on you?
MS: The imposing was to cut the picture for an R, because we were getting an X. There's a long story. [In] Julia Phillips' book there's detailed stories about how she handled it, or Michael, and everyone else.
I didn't know what else to do. I did have to cut some of the flowing blood sort of thing. Some of those things, I'm used to it because -- I don't want to spoil it for you, but there's a person there with a pump, and there's a wire, and you don't realize it.
Even the beginning of Goodfellas -- we had a preview where Joe Pesci takes out a knife and stabs Frank Vincent in the trunk of the car. In the first cut, we had seven stabs and it's a big kitchen knife. Even then, after the second thrust, people started to leave, and Thelma [Schoonmaker, editor] tells me, "I think we have like six more."
It's not an excuse, though, because I did have to trim frames and that sort of thing, especially with the hand. There's no music over the shootout either, which makes it very disturbing.
And then somehow, some way -- lots of trouble, lots of arguing, lots of fights -- I said, "Hey, I have an idea. What if I tone the color down?" I just grabbed it out of a hat, which was, in a way, an excuse to do something I always wanted to do.
Actually, I wanted the whole picture to be that way. I think the last time it was used that way was Reflections in a Golden Eye, but everybody complained because they came out of the theater and it said the film is in Technicolor and they said "It's not in color!" Yes it is!
But in any event, it took us some doing, but I liked it a lot. And also it gave me an extra -- serendipity, I guess you say. It gave it more of a tabloid feel. The whole picture should have looked that way. Michael Chapman, his photography's extraordinary, but he liked what we did, too, I think.
PS: I should add -- because I saw this in Berlin a month ago -- that Marty made the decision to try to restore the film to the condition it was when it was first projected at the Beacon in 1976, and that included a very tattered logo from Columbia Pictures.
MS: Because Dan Perri and I did the title sequence and that's when we got the idea to keep it as grainy and contrast as high as the last sequence of the film. That's why it came up kind of dirty looking in a way. Gritty, but tabloid feeling.
Q: What were your feelings when you saw the finished product?
PS: Marty had a lot of trepidation when he first showed it to me. I was just bowled over. I had written more kind of loneliness dialog and Marty was apologizing and saying "It just didn't work, it was too long, we had to cut some of it out."
And I realized we don't need that dialog anymore. We have this huge yellow monster, and every time you see that taxicab you see loneliness. You don't have to talk about it anymore. We have a visual metaphor that has supplanted language. That was my impression when I saw it.
MS: There was a big choice to be made because the Checkers [cabs] were still around and we always loved those Checkers -- but a big jolly Checker is a happy car.
So we were thinking of the sleek ones going in and out of the city, the smaller ones, the sedans or whatever they call those things.
But at one point I said, "We'll never get the camera in there. We'll never get it shot, so let's go with the bigger car."
I came up with the idea of the opening shot and the steam. Some critic had said "Oh, that's the level of the metaphor in the film." I never thought of that; it's just Manhattan with the steam. You want to see it as hell, fine with me.
Q: Looking back at the movie 35 years later, do you have any reflections on it?
PS: I don't look back on it. I try not to and just keep moving forward. I don't know about you, Marty, but I always see everything I could have done better.
I'm very gratified and humbled to be lucky enough to be part of a film that somehow continues to resonate and have a life. That's just luck, serendipity.
There's talent involved, but talent doesn't necessarily have that effect. But I have no real desire to revisit it.
MS: No desire to see it again either -- pretty much any film I've made, unless there's a nice musical sequence. Some of the rock films and rock documentaries I've made, I watch some of them.
And also for me, some times are good and some times are difficult in life. The films are so personal to me, I get so involved with the whole process and everything during the editing and all of that, that sometimes it's hard to revisit that personal time. It has nothing to do with the picture or the reaction to the film.
The summer season of See It Big! opens with two films -- Stanley Kubrick’s sci-fi masterpiece 2001: A Space Odyssey (in a pristine digital restoration) screening July 6 - 8 and Francis Ford Coppola’s imaginative musical One from the Heart, will be screened on July 14 - 15, in a 35mm restoration supervised by Coppola himself.
This tale of ruined lovers in a dream-like Las Vegas was almost completely shot on a Hollywood stage set designed by Dean Tavoularis. Drawings by Tavoularis and behind-the-scenes set photos from the film are on view.
2001 is highlighted in an exhibition of the work of special effects supervisor Douglas Trumbull who created the legendary “Stargate” sequence that ends the film. Other titles in the See It Big! series include:
Coppola’s Apocalypse Now Redux, on a double bill with One from the Heart (July 14 - 15)
Michael Powell and Emeric Pressburger’s The Red Shoes and The Life and Death of Colonel Blimp -- which Oscar-winning film editor and the late Powell's wife Thelma Schoonmaker will introduce and show a short video about the film’s restoration(July 21 - 22)
Alfred Hitchcock’s Vertigo, presented in a rare 35mm Technicolor print, and To Catch a Thief (July 28 - 29)
a western double-feature of The Wild Bunch and Rio Bravo (August 4 - 5)
David Lean’s The Bridge on the River Kwai and Doctor Zhivago (August 1 - 2)
Taxi Driver (August 17 - 19)
Brazil (August 24 - 26)
Blue Velvet (August 25 - 26)
See It Big! was organized by Chief Curator David Schwartz, Assistant Film Curator Rachael Rakes and the editors of online film journal Reverse Shot, Michael Koresky and Jeff Reichert.
Tickets are included with paid Museum admission ($12 adults / $9 senior citizens and college students / $6 children 3–17) and are free for Museum members.
For a full schedule go to: movingimage.us
See It Big!July 6th - Sept. 28th, 2012
Museum of the Moving Image36-01 35 Avenue (at 37 Street)Astoria, Queens
Page 325 of 343
Sign up for our weekly newsletter!