the traveler's resource guide to festivals & films
a FestivalTravelNetwork.com site
part of Insider Media llc.
The latest vintage of Rendez-Vous with French Cinema (February 28 to March 10, 2013), the annual harvest of contemporary French film from the Film Society of Lincoln Center and Unifrance Films, gives cause to clink glasses. A particularly heady offering is Gilles Legrand's new father-son drama You Will Be My Son (Tu seras mon fils), set in the world of Bordeaux terroirs.
Picture formations of sunshine-caressed vines climbing up and down the hill, with the medieval fortress in the background. Picture a world where wine is taken more seriously than anything else.
Endless reds and whites are tasted throughout the movie; few are drunk; most are spat out, as befits professionals. In one scene, a winemaker who is visiting his dying father in the hospital attempts to pour the doctor and nurse some of that ambrosia (“not on the job, monsieur”). The latter wrinkles her nose and delivers a spot-on analysis of all the 999 components. I melted. A rare US nurse who speaks English would know the difference between Diet Coke and Coke Classic, at best.
The mood here is anything but playful à la California comedy Sideways. Wine is serious business. It's the maker and breaker of relationships among the characters, sometimes even the killer. The plot and characters are as old-fashioned as a 19th-century family novel: there is formidable vineyard owner Paul de Marseul; his weak son Martin (Lorànt Deutsch) and his dying estate manager (Patrick Chesnais) who, it seems, can only be replaced by his own son Philippe (Nicolas Bridet), who is everything de Marseul fils is not. And the reigning element is ze palate - it’s all about ze palate!
Actually, it’s more than that – it’s about being professional against being paternal. Should de Marseul have his business inherited by his son, whom he disdains, or by Philippe, who's in a better position to save the brand? It's blood vs. wine, and de Marseul comes up with an ingenuous legal way to solve the problem: did you know that in France you may adopt an adult, even one whose parent is still alive?
This maneuver comes atop one scene after another where de Marseul thoroughly humiliates his son for everything under the Saint-Émilion sun, from jogging US-style to failing to supply a grandson. With most actors, resentment of the old man would have already forced me out of the theater; but de Marseul is played with remarkable precision and panache by Nils Arestrup (recently in Spielberg’s War Horse, and especially fabulous as a Corsican godfather in A Prophet). Arestrup's de Marseul doesn’t just dump on his son gratuitously; we see what’s behind each humiliation, and this knowledge makes us pause and not dismiss de Marseul out of hand. Everyone and everything in this movie, from the rest of the cast to the beautiful landscapes and even wines and $3,000 shoes (that’s a story unto itself), is a supporting character to Arestrup’s.
With the exception of a final twist in the plot –- which only seems surprising but on balance is a perfectly logical denouement –- You Will Be My Son is a solid and intelligent discourse on life and life’s work, made seriously and respectfully without falling back on one-liners and “teachable moments” that derail so many Hollywood movies. People who don’t care for this sort of thing should stick to jug wine and leave Pétrus alone.
The Laramie Project Cycle
Liv Rooth and Carson Ellrod in All in the Timing (photo: James Leynse) |
Identity Thief
Directed by Seth Gordon
starring Jason Bateman, Melissa McCarthy
A surprisingly vulgar, crude, and manically unfunny film to avoid is this unfortunate Identity Thief, which takes a topical red flag issue and makes it absurd and fleece-lined cuddly by starring the usually hilarious Melissa McCarthy and the solidly talented Jason Bateman. Most of the film is so unpleasant and unbelievably ill-intentioned that you won’t believe these two stellar actors would sign on.
Near-nebbish-citizen and mild-mannered businessman Sandy Patterson (Bateman) treks from Colorado to Florida to hunt his criminal nemesis, a seemingly ditzy, cheery-looking woman (also named Sandy Patterson or so it seems) played by McCarthy who has been living very large after hoisting Patterson’s identity, cards and bank account.
The audience managed to not laugh throughout, which is no accomplishment, since there was precious little to evoke it. Even Bateman’s smart downplaying and under-acting fails to ignite anything beyond disgust at the plot turns.
Amanda Peet has the thankless role as his wife Penelope awaiting Patterson’s return home for the length of the film. The last 10 minutes of wrap-up do not redeem this downer, and even this writer and her usual movie-seat companion failed to ratchet the laugh-meter up to the eensiest first notch. Worse, the seriousness of the issue, and the obnoxiousness of its treatment here, is such that tension knotted one’s stomach for the full first hour. The scriptwriter should wear a sign on his chest with a huge E for execrable as he goes about his clearly delta-minus life.
Side Effects
Directed by Steven Soderbergh
starring Jude Law, Rooney Mara, Catherine Zeta-Jones, Polly Draper
A cleverly plotted film that only reluctantly becomes evident, Side Effects is a Hitchcockian roller coaster ride starring a taut Jude Law, a nearly unrecognizable Rooney Mara, a buttoned-up Catherine Zeta-Jones and Polly Draper (she of the whiskey voice from Thirty Something).
Not wanting to say too much about the plot since one of the rewarding aspects of this film is discovering what’s going on, but here's a nominal summation.
A young New York couple’s tidy world unravels when a new anti-anxiety drug prescribed by Emily's (Mara) psychiatrist (Law) has unexpected effects on its patient, husband (Channing Tatum) -- who has just been released from prison -- and others. Don’t expect Tatum, again beefcake delectable, to be seen for more than the briefest of celluloid moments.
The baddies in this thriller are not whom or what you originally think, especially given the title.
The pharma industry now dubs them “adverse events,” which neatly avoids the chilling taint connoted by the earlier, more popularly known term. One of the choicer elements of the film is its exceptional photography; one sees a Gotham that is not the tired vernacular.
This scenic Trou Normand may coast under one’s radar, but it is elegant, almost-Gordon Willis-level cinematography (from Woody Allen’s more elegaic films), a gift floated to the receptive viewer.
Audience members, many of them apparently physicians and therapists, gabbed with each other afterwards, discussing their take on the goings-on, comparing notes from their practices.