the traveler's resource guide to festivals & films
a FestivalTravelNetwork.com site
part of Insider Media llc.
The Awards Season officially begins in December. The question of who’s going to get the golden trophy, regardless of it’s being a Golden Globe or an Oscar® or something totally different in the early months of 2010 is not only good fun for us fans but a deadly earnest endeavor for the movie companies. There are millions of dollars at stake, after all, and the big contenders will get a limited release for a brief time this month before going wide in January, thus giving the impression that January’s movies always suck.
What many people don’t know, is that the some of the “lesser” Oscars® are actually have what are for the most part “semi-finals” and these are made public now.
For a film to qualify for the Best Short category, it has to have either a three-day theatrical release, or have won an award at an authorized festival, (TV pilots, such as Courage the Cowardly Dog, which was nominated in 1997, are verboten) then the judges sift through all the submissions and pick the semifinalists, who then are screened by everyone who’s qualified to vote for a “real” nominee. They then vote for the finalists, and these are shown to the academy voters on a number of screenings.
Only those who have attended these “mini-fests” can actually vote for best short.
However, perusing through the list we can kind of guess where the judges were going here. At least three of the entries have won before, and director Nick Park, in fact, wins just about every time he submits one. So bet on him.
Through the miracle of YouTube, you can either see clips from these films, or if they’re short enough, the whole thing.
The Cat Piano
directors Eddie White and Ari Gibson
(The People’s Republic of Animation)
A city of singing cats is preyed upon by a shadowy figure intent on performing a twisted feline symphony.
French Roast
director Fabrice O. Joubert
(Pumpkin Factory/Bibo Films
The Trailer
Granny O’Grimm’s Sleeping Beauty
director Nicky Phelan / producer Darragh O’Connell
(Brown Bag Films)
Ganny bitches to her granddaughter while telling bedtime story
The Kinematograph
director-producer Tomek Baginski
(Platige Image)
Polish director Baginski, whose Fallen Art redefined CG short films in 2005 (they've won just about every festival prize there is) has finished his latest mini-masterwork about an inventor and his infernal invention.
The Lady and the Reaper / La Dama y la Muerte
director Javier Recio Gracia
(Kandor Graphics and Green Moon)
A humorous look at death.
Logorama
producer Nicolas Schmerkin
(Autour de Minuit)
Wallace and Gromit: A Matter of Loaf and Death
director Nick Park
(Aardman Animations Ltd)
Someone is killing all the local bakers in town! Can Wallace & Gromit ™ crack the case?
Partly Cloudy
director Peter Sohn
(Pixar Animation Studios)
The “Stork Theory” of reproduction is explored.
Runaway
director Cordell Barker
(National Film Board of Canada)
Naturally there are victims, but in the end everyone is equal.
Variete
director Roelof van den Bergh
(il Luster Productions)
Competing with the Oscars® are the Annie® awards which are run by ASIFA, the international animation society. This year's batch of nominees, is unusual because there are no overlaps the Oscar® semifinalists. They are:
Pups of Liberty
(Picnic Pictures)
Robot Chicken: Star Wars 2.5
(ShadowMachine)
Santa, The Fascist Years
{Plymptoons)
The Rooster, The Crocodile and The Night Sky
(Barley Films)
The Story of Walls
(Badmash Animation Studios)
Paranormal Activity
(2007, 99 min, USA)
Written and Directed by Oren Peli
starring: Katie Featherston and Micah Sloat
For a minimal amount of money, a filmmaker can make a professional quality film that looks 10 times as expensive as it really is. Director Peli has done this, adding a minimum of carefully placed special effects to make his Blair Witch Project inspired no-budget horror film into something actually scary.
Katie (Featherston) and Micah (Sloat) are lower-upperclass live-togethers who have a bit of a ghost problem. Katie has been bothered by an entity since she was eight and it follows her wherever she goes. Micah thinks that a little ghost hunting might be fun, so he gets lots of equipment and starts shooting.
That's the Blair Witch aspect. With the conceit that this is amateur video, Peli and company can get away with most of the film being a no-budget comedy of manners with the two principals bickering over all sorts of stuff, while simple digital animation effectively scares the willies out of you.
This is the kind of horror film that's effective because of the cheapness of the production. The more expensive special effects perfectly blend in with the pseudo-amateur video and add realism to the whole affair. This is worth a place on the Netflix queue.
An Education
Directed by Lone Scherfig
Starring Carey Mulligan, Peter Sarsgaard, Emma Thompson, Olivia Williams, Sally Hawkins, Lynn Barber and Dominic Cooper
Lynn Barber has been writing about sex for decades and has been very successful at it. So, as one of the most famous mainstream journalists in Britain on that particular subject, she eventually wrote her memoirs, and part of it became this movie. Nick Hornby, who gave us About a Boy and High Fidelity, has changed the names to protect the guilty and gone on to create an excellent script ably directed by Scherfig.
The fictionalized version of Barber is Jenny (Mulligan), a senior in British high school who is looking forward to going to Oxford to "read" (major in) English. Her parents (Molina and Seymour) want this, too, and all seems to be going along swimmingly until she meets a charming mystery, David (Sarsgaard), who knocks the socks off Jenny and her parents. He and his pals Danny (Cooper) and Helen (Pike) whisk her away to a fairyland of posh London nightlife, which leads her teachers to believe her new friends are up to no good. They are right. Jenny is heading for some sort of fall. But will she able to avoid it, or at least get back up?
Every morning, after returning from the cafe next to my apartment building, I turn on my computer and delete spam. There's tons of it. Most of the time it's things like: "Congratulations! You've just won a chance to get robbed!" or something like that. But I can't just delete the previous evening's emails in one fell swoop. Every now and then there's something that comes out of the blue which might actually be worth responding to.
Sandwiched between the Nigerian versions of The Spanish Prisoner and the Dutch lottery drawings for games I never entered, there are usually some legitimate screening invitations and jokes sent by friends. I get to these after the email count goes down from 87 to 12. One of these was an invite to a Disney/Pixar film press junket being held in California. I was about to delete it, when, as a joke, I decided to reply.
I know why they have these things. Advertising. The fawning press is supposed to ask some softball questions for the evening newscast, or to get some background from a producer for a feature in a magazine or newspaper. You get everyone in the same place and it's actually pretty easy for all involved.
Now one can see why they do this for a film that's coming out. Even if the buzz is terrific, the studios still need publicity in order for that all important first weekend. It's a major expense, but a necessary one.
Sometimes, during major film festivals, the survivors of some old films are trotted out for the press. Just a couple of months ago, they had press conferences for El Topo and Reds -- films with great reputations which few have seen in many years. That's understandable, too. But what I couldn't understand is why they would have a full-fledged junket for the animated feature, Cars.
Now don't get me wrong, I'm not talking about the one they had last June. They should have had one just before the film came out. No, I'm talking about having another one four months later for the release of the DVD.
I saw the film twice when it first came out, once at the regular press screening and then at the screening for the IMAX version, and I gave the thing a good review. Maybe that's why they invited me, I don't know, but going out there, on their dime, and getting to see the innards of this magical factory, that is something no one in their right mind would pass up.
That's what made this trip so disappointing. We didn't actually see all that much. This was only what was advertised, nothing more. Damn!
I don't really want to seem ungrateful. San Francisco is a great city, and had I not had to get back when I did, I would have had an extremely enjoyable day hanging out on Market or Polk Street. The food was wonderful and the Hotel Monaco [501 Geary St, San Francisco, CA 94102] has soft beds and a wonderful free wine tasting program. But that's not why I was there. I was there to see Pixar, and if I saw nothing else, that would be just dandy.
The lot of us got together at 6:45 am in the lobby, and got on a pair of minibuses where we headed out over the Bay Bridge and into Marin County, Passing Berkeley and into the town of Emoryville, which is sort of in Oakland, and where all the factories are. The scenery was very much like it was on the other side of America, with the beginnings of autumn changing the trees from green to orange and gold. It was all very California.
Sooner than expected, there we were. They let us out of the vans and we walked into the building. the Pixar building is a two-story structure with a huge interior "courtyard" surrounded by two wings which are connected on the second floor by a bridge. The schedule went something like this:
Breakfast
Sign-in
The morning roundtables
Lunch
The Afternoon screenings
A tour of the campus
Back to the Hotel
Breakfast was really good. Various versions of scrambled eggs and cheese omelets, and really fine coffee and fruit. Then we had to sign in. I'm sorry. The sign-in was lame. Usually when you sign in for one of these things, you just sign your name on a register, grab some press materials and go on. That's lame too, but in the usual bureaucratic way. Nobody minds that.
This time, we had to go through a pseudo-DMV type thing, where we had to recognize some of the characters and do a quiz, followed by a demo of the video game (that part would have been fine, but I suck at that sort of thing). This was too cute by half. If there were little children there, that would be one thing, but you had a few dozen adults going through this none-too-pleased.
Then we had some more food and wandered around the vast area that was the first floor for a bit before lining up and heading past the "unauthorized personnel forbidden" signs and up the stairs for three round tables with a couple of the storyboarders and some technicians, who told us about how much work it is to do lighting in an all CGI film and how to make color packets for the techies doing the rendering. That was fine, then we went downstairs again where a couple of people showed us how wonderful all the extras were.
Now extras are important to a DVD. Nobody likes "vanilla," and no one did vanilla more annoyingly than Disney did back in the day. The original Roger Rabbit had a list of them where actually weren't on the disc.
Pixar knows this and they're justly proud of what they did on some of their earlier efforts. They gave us a brief tour of what's on there, and the whole presentation was mostly boring. Menus are like that. However, I want a plasma TV more than ever. God that was beautiful.
Then came lunch, and this was where the problems started. No. The food was terrific, the buffet was to perfection and I enjoyed every morsel. The problem was stonewalling. I sat down and there he was. Director John Lasseter, sitting catty corner from me. He was very pleasant, and I decided, since I was there, to find out what exactly was going on with the studio. Bang! He and his main flunky are very good at stonewalling. They had just come out with a new short, called Lifted, and they had a few signs for it on the wall. I asked about it and they seemed very exited, although they wouldn't say anything specific.
I asked about the next project he's producing, Ratatouille, and the project after that, W.A.L.L.-E.... Stonewall.
I persisted. "Do you see any posters for Meet the Robinsons... do you?" he snarled at me. I was there to do journalism, right? But what was I supposed to do? I couldn't do what I wanted, after all it was on their dime and in their house.
This was a squandered opportunity on Pixar's part. If you're going to spend thousands of dollars to bring people thousands of miles, it would be really cool to dazzle them. Show them a tease here and there like some character designs for Ratatouille, or Lifted, for example.
We've got something special for you! Not special like a t-shirt (which I'm wearing, by the way), something that you can tell your readers in confidence.
The afternoon sessions were rather boring. They showed us the specially-made cartoon for the DVD, Mater and the GhostLight, and that wasn't particularly good. The character of Mater in the feature was silly and colorful, but he was actually one of the more intelligent characters. Here he's just a moronic child. The punch line was cute but the build up wasn't.
But you can't say "This sucks" on their turf. The questions were for the most part polite and perfunctory. Lasseter made his official appearance and talked about how how he was inspired by a road trip he took with his family after Toy Story 2 was finished. Very sweet. Of course the original concept had nothing to do with the finished film except for the fact that all of the characters were automotive. I was still a bit ticked off.
Then we took the tour. We actually saw quite a bit of the preliminary art from Cars, and some from Finding Nemo. But we didn't see anyone working. That was all hidden. We did go outside and see the volleyball court.
We went back to the hotel and drank more free wine before having dinner on Disney's dime. It helped me sleep on the flight back.
The Hotel Monaco
501 Geary St.
San Francisco, CA 94102
http://www.monaco-sf.com/