the traveler's resource guide to festivals & films
a FestivalTravelNetwork.com site
part of Insider Media llc.
Conductor Gustavo Dudamel (L) & soloist María Dueñas (R) with the Los Angeles Philharmonic. Photo by Chris Lee
At Carnegie Hall, on the evening of Tuesday, October 25th, I had the privilege to attend a fabulous concert presented by the splendid Los Angeles Philharmonic—under the masterful direction of Gustavo Dudamel—the first of two on consecutive nights.
The event opened remarkably with the New York premiere of Gabriela Ortiz’s eccentric, eclectic, impressively orchestrated Altar de cuerda for Violin and Orchestra, admirably performed by the attractive soloist, María Dueñas, who wore a gorgeous, shimmering gown. In his note for this program, Juan Arturo Brennan usefully provides some context for the piece:
As of May 2022, Mexican composer Gabriela Ortiz has created seven works in the series of “musical altars,” and there is no reason to assume that she will not write more in the future. This is the full list so far:
Altar de neón(1995), for four percussionists and chamber orchestra
Altar de muertos(1997), for string quartet, water drums, and masks
Altar de piedra(2002), for three percussionists and orchestra
Altar de fuego(2010), for orchestra
Altar de luz(2013), for tape
Altar de viento(2015), for flute and orchestra
He adds:
In recent years, Ortiz has established a close working relationship with the Los Angeles Philharmonic, a relationship which has produced several works and their respective premieres: Altar de piedra (2002),Téenek (2017), Pico-Bite-Beat (2018), Yanga (2019), and Kauyumari (2021). When in 2021 the opportunity for a further collaboration arose, the composer was ready (and willing) to write a violin concerto. Then, Gustavo Dudamel, the Philharmonic’s music and artistic director, put forth the name of the brilliant young Spanish violinist María Dueñas. Thus, the stage was set for the creation ofAltar de cuerda (String Altar), for violin and orchestra.
He also says that “Ortiz wrote Altar de cuerda between September and December 2021, on a commission from the Los Angeles Philharmonic, and the work is, as it happens, the first concerto dedicated to María Dueñas,” and that “Ortiz proceeds according to tradition and chooses the usual three-movement structure, fast–slow–fast.”
The first movement—titled “Morisco chilango,” which means “Chilango Moorish” (“chilango” is a term for Mexico City natives of which the composer is one) and thus alludes to the Andalusian background of the violinist—is exuberant, even extravagant. The second movement, “Canto abierto” has an unearthly quality; Brennan states: “At the beginning and at the end of the movement, all wind players (both woodwind and brass) play tuned crystal glasses, which create an additional harmonic field.” He adds about the finale, which was the most exciting and enjoyable movement: “’Maya déco’ is a virtuosic, rhythmic, and fast-paced movement, with a constant dialogue between the solo violin and the orchestra; near the end of the piece, there is a fully written-out cadenza for the soloist.” The composer was present to receive the audience’s acclaim and Dueñas played a challenging encore: Francisco Tárrega’sRecuerdos de la Alhambra, arranged by Ruggiero Ricci.
The highlight of the evening, however, was an enthralling reading of Gustav Mahler’s magnificent First Symphony. About the piece, program annotator John Mangum explains:
After its Budapest premiere, Mahler revised it for performances in Hamburg (1893) and Weimar (1894), finally excising an entire movement and premiering the work in (nearly) its present form in Berlin in 1896. The version published in 1899 reflects further revision, primarily to the work’s orchestration.
The introduction to the first movement was hushed and mysterious; after this, a joyous, pastoral ethos dominated at the outset, although it eventually acquired a more dramatic character. The next movement is a brilliant Ländler, also exultant, with a more subdued, charming trio section. The third movement—certainly the symphony’s most ironic—is a haunting funeral march, unusually combined with Klezmer music and featuring a lyrical interlude. The amazing finale begins tumultuously and very energetically, although it accedes to a yearning Romanticism; the turbulence returns and then at length builds to a resoundingly affirmative conclusion.
The second concert was also outstanding, beginning exhilaratingly with a stunning account of another New York premiere of an Ortiz work, the mesmerizing, superbly orchestrated Kauyumari. I here reproduce the composer’s comment on it:
Among the Huichol people of Mexico,kauyumarimeans “blue deer.” The blue deer represents a spiritual guide, one that is transformed through an extended pilgrimage into a hallucinogenic cactus called peyote. It allows the Huichol to communicate with their ancestors, do their bidding, and take on their role as guardians of the planet. Each year, these Native Mexicans embark on a symbolic journey to “hunt” the blue deer, making offerings in gratitude for having been granted access to the invisible world, through which they also are able to heal the wounds of the soul.
When I received the commission from the Los Angeles Philharmonic to compose a piece that would reflect on our return to the stage following the pandemic, I immediately thought of the blue deer and its power to enter the world of the intangible as akin to a celebration of the reopening of live music. Specifically, I thought of a Huichol melody sung by the De La Cruz family—dedicated to recording ancestral folklore.
I used this material within the orchestral context and elaborated on the construction and progressive development of the melody and its accompaniment in such a way that it would symbolize the blue deer. This in turn was transformed into an orchestral texture which gradually evolves into a complex rhythm pattern, to such a degree that the melody itself becomes unrecognizable, giving rise to a choral wind section while maintaining an incisive rhythmic accompaniment as a form of reassurance that the world will naturally follow its course.
While composing this piece, I noted once again how music has the power to grant us access to the intangible, healing our wounds and binding us to what can only be expressed through sound.
Although life is filled with interruptions,Kauyumariis a comprehension and celebration of the fact that each of these rifts is also a new beginning.
Ortiz again entered the stage for an ovation.
The fantastic soloist, Anne Akiko Meyers—she wore a sparkling silver dress—then emerged to dazzlingly perform another exceptional New York premiere: the extraordinaryFandangofor Violin and Orchestra by Arturo Márquez. The composer’s remarks on it are as follows:
The fandango is known worldwide as a popular Spanish dance, and specifically as one of the fundamental styles (palos) of flamenco. Since its appearance in the 18th century in Spain, thefandangomoved to the Americas, where it acquired a personality according to the land that adopted and cultivated it. Today, we can still find it in countries such as Ecuador, Colombia, and Mexico. In the latter—specifically, in the state of Veracruz and in the Huasteca area—the fandango acquired a tinge different from the Spanish genre. For centuries, it has been a special festivity for musicians, singers, poets, and dancers. Everyone gathers around a wooden platform to stamp their feet, sing, and improvisedécimas(poetry consisting of 10-line stanzas) for the occasion.
In 2018, I received an email from violinist Anne Akiko Meyers, in which she offered me the possibility of writing a work for violin and orchestra that had to do with Mexican music. The proposal interested and fascinated me from that very moment. I had already tried, unsuccessfully, to compose a violin concerto some 20 years earlier with ideas that were based on the Mexicanfandango. I had known this music since I was a child, listening to it in the cinema, on the radio, and played by my father (Arturo Márquez, Sr.), a mariachi violinist. Also, the violin was my first instrument when I was 14 years old (1965); I studied it in La Puente, California, in Los Angeles County, where the work was (eventually) premiered.
Fandango for Violin and Orchestra is formally a concerto in three movements. The first movement, “Folia Tropical,” has the form of the sonata: introduction, exposition with its two themes, bridge, development, and recapitulation. The introduction and the two themes share the same motif in a totally different way. Emotionally, the introduction is a call to the remote history of thefandango; the first theme and the bridge, this one totally rhythmic, are based on the Caribbean “clave,” and the second is almost like a romantic bolero. Foliasare ancient dances that come from Portugal and Spain.
The second movement, “Plegaria” (“Prayer”), pays tribute to the mariachihuapangoalong with the Spanishfandango. It is also a freely treated chaconne. Perhaps few would know that the chaconne, as well as thezarabanda, were two dances forbidden by the Spanish Inquisition, long before they became part of European Baroque music.
The third movement, “Fandanguito,” is a tribute to the famousFandanguito Huasteco. The music of this region features violin,jarana huasteca(a small rhythm guitar), andhuapanguera(bass guitar with five courses of strings), and, of course, it accompanies the singing ofsonesand sung or recited improvisation. Thehuastecoviolin has certain features similar to Baroque style, but with great rhythmic vitality and rich variety of bow strokes. This third movement demands great virtuosity from the soloist, and it is the music that I have kept in my heart for decades.
I think that for every composer it is a real challenge to compose new works in old forms, especially when that repertoire is part of the fundamental structure of classical music. But I have preserved my seven capital principles: tonality, modality, melody, rhythm, imaginary folk tradition, harmony, and orchestral color.
The opening movement, “Folia Tropical,” was lively and delightful, with a lyrical passage. The second, “Plegaria (Chaconne),” was also appealing, although more intimate, with some more dramatic elements, succeeded by an ebullient finale.
The concert concluded rewardingly with a confident version of Aaron Copland’s imposing Third Symphony, which program annotator John Henken aptly describes as “abstract Americana.” On Copland’s composition of the work, he reveals that:
He was working on a commission from conductor Serge Koussevitzky, and the knowledge that the work would be dedicated to the memory of Koussevitzky’s wife, Natalie, certainly influenced the lyric cast of the symphony. It was completed in 1946 at the MacDowell Colony in New Hampshire and premiered by Koussevitzky and the Boston Symphony Orchestra in October of that year. The conductor had no reservations about what Copland supplied, labeling it “the greatest American symphony—it goes from the heart to the heart.”
The majestic opening movement, like the symphony as a whole, radiates a pure Copland sound, and indeed casts a spell. Copland characterized it thus: “The themes—three in number—are plainly stated: the first in strings at the very start without introduction; the second, in a related mood, in violas and oboes; the third, of a bolder nature, in trombones and horns.” The ensuingAllegro molto,is dance-like although weighty, but concludes with a powerful affirmation. The third movement is more meditative at first but becomes more spirited. About it, Copland said it “is the freest of all in formal structure. Although it is built sectionally, the various sections are intended to emerge one from the other in continuous flow, somewhat in the manner of a closely knit series of variations.” Henken notes that “The ‘continuous flow’ of the movement extends even into the finale, which has its own introduction, based on Copland’sFanfare for the Common Man.” This is the most complex and ambitious movement and it concludes stupendously.
Especially enthusiastic applause drew forth a terrific encore: “Celebration” from the great score for the ballet,Billy the Kid.