the traveler's resource guide to festivals & films
a FestivalTravelNetwork.com site
part of Insider Media llc.
"We're The Millers"
Directed by Rawson Marshall Thurber
Starring Jason Sudeikis, Jennifer Aniston, Will Poulter, Emma Roberts, Ed Helms, Nick Offerman, Kathryn Hahn, Mark L. Young
Comedy, Crime
110 Minutes
R
Filler entertainment for sure, We're the Millers is caught somewhere in between the hard-R, cuss-laden adult comedy and your run-of-the-mill, PG-13 family comedy with a soul. It stokes enough laughs to keep the engine churning for its 110 minute run time but when all is said and done, it's just another comedy kept buoyant by chuckles with little living behind the curtain, sloppily saddled with a moral message far out of its natural reach. You won't walk out regretting what you've seen but you'll be hard pressed to remember it by name a year down the line.
Proving that he knows how to milk a good laugh, director Rawson Marshall Thurber is no stranger to comedy. Back in 2004, he directed the much revered (at least by this guy and his high school buddies) Dodgeball: A True Underdog Story. In case you are wondering, yes, that is the movie you're thinking of. Apparently the world just forgot about the most unnecessarily tacked on post-colon fragment of all time in the whole "A True Understory Story" bit but trust me (and IMDB), it's part of the name.
While Thurber was the solitary writer behind the laugh riot that was Dodgeball, We're the Millers has an exorbitant six writers. If writing duties were shared evenly, that calculates to about 18 minutes from each scribe. No wonder the film feels so tonally jarring, rocking back and forth between sweet and sour, shmaltzy and irreverent. When you finally feel like you have a read on Thurber's voice, it turns on a dime from lewd to sentimental and back again. Like an amusement park ride that spins more than it moves forward, the result is dizzying, disorienting and may make you wanna puke.
The exalted Dodgeball also had Ben Stiller, Vince Vaughn and a pre-pariah Lance Armstrong working for it while We're the Millers rests on the comedic shoulders of Jason Sudeikis and Jennifer Aniston. Sudeikis was a pleasant surprise in Horrible Bosses but he's still something of an unproven talent while Aniston has largely played the same girl next door with boy issues every since her role as Rachel on Friends. She certainly did break character in Horrible Bosses as the pushy sexual deviant boss, which ultimately resulted in one of the biggest breaths of fresh air in her entire career. For some of her onscreen time in this, she captures a similarly charmless aura but, about halfway through, descends to the flippant level we've come to expect of her.
And although this isn't Sudekis's first rodeo, it is essentially his first go-around as the leading man. As a supporting character, Sudekis thrives with his bohemian dude-isms. He's that silent bomber that swoops in and steals the laugh but here, he owns the pony show and is happy to try and strike at all the bells and whistles. Even in moments where the film stagnates, he satisfying leads the cast with his easygoing, quip-laden energy and eager beaver physical comedy.
Sudekis plays the role of David Clark, a 30-something burn out drug dealer working for his nerdy-college-buddy-turned-pot-kingpin (Ed Helms). When David gets robbed by a fuzzy-haired pack of hoods, he is enlisted to carry a smidge and a half of pot (read two hundred pounds) over from the dusty lawlessness of Mexico. In an attempt to be inconspicuous, he employs stripper neighbor, Rose (Aniston), apartment twerp/dork/loser/virgin, Kenny (Will Poulter), and hood-rat hobo with an iPhone 5, Casey (Emma Roberts) to impersonate a hapless, all American family on an RV vacation. Naturally, the border guards wouldn't suspect a pink polo-sporting family to be smuggling tens of millions of dollars worth of sweet, sticky ganja across the heavily guarded US border.
There are moments of stitch-inducing laughs peppered throughout but it's hard to shake the feeling that this is a minor experience in a minor film. Nonetheless, there are moments that really got a rise out of me, such as an impromptu learning-to-kiss seminar that is gruelingly awkward as well as various asides from Sudekis, spoken or even just mouthed, but two days after watching the film and the effects have already mostly washed off. Regardless of its relative levity and how easy it is to write off, it was a film that I didn't feel bad snickering at alongside the audience exploding in a cacophony of laughter around me. In terms of the immediate experience of having a good time at the movies, We're the Millers accomplishes that goal.
What I did have an issue with is the shoehorning in of moral lessons surrounding the troubles of drug dealing. There's a sort of implied agreement that if you're going to see a stoner comedy about a sourpatch burnout slinging bags of weed with names like "Fucking Awesome" and "Alaska Thunderfuck" then you don't really have any moral credo against the illicit substance. We don't need to be told that drug dealing is bad and, by extension, don't need to see our hero turn away from it in order to understand that he's actually a good guy.
There was never a "Cheech and Chong Turn Narcs!" for a reason just as Pineapple Express didn't end with James Franco and Seth Rogen swearing off the substance forever. It's an unnecessary turning point for a film that already is trying to stand for the importance of the family. Being a comedy with a little bit of a message is one thing. Being a moral guard of the US War on Drugs is quite another. Had they just stuck by the idea that things are better in twos, or threes, or fours, it could have had enough of a sugarcoat to satisfy the older demographics but instead it tilts too far into preachy, moral guardianship. By the end, two is two too many ethical judgments for this comedy to cram in.
But, let's not get too down on it. It's a fun movie right? That's the point, right? Surely, but it's also the reason why I won't be prancing through town singing its praises. I thought the ongoing Scotty P. "You know what I'm sayin'" gag was hilarious, I laughed a lot when Kenny was in the throes of a kiss gangbang and even Jennifer Aniston hit more than she missed (even if she should retire stripping from her resume as soon as possible). But in the end, it's not much more than throwaway entertainment that'll see a meager return on its investment, have a quick HBO run and disappear into the same discount bin that Horrible Bosses lingers in today a mere two years after its release.
Follow SmartFilm on Facebook.
Follow Smartfilm on Twitter.
"Blue Jasmine"
Directed by Woody Allem
Starring Cate Blanchett, Alec Baldwin, Sally Hawkins, Andrew Dice Clay, Bobby Cannavale, Louis C.K., Peter Skarsgaard, Michael Stuhlbarg
Drama
98 Mins
PG-13
In the aftermath of Blue Jasmine, the thing that people will be talking about most is Cate Blanchett's performance - a role for which she is assured an Oscar nomination. But while Blanchett is busy giving her powerhouse turn as titular Jasmine, Mr. Woody Allen is in the back corner shamelessly plagiarizing. This accusation rings true as the characters, beats, themes, and plots are pulled straight from the pages of Tennessee William's A Streetcar Named Desire. Those unfamiliar with the iconic play - or the Marlon Brando film - will be more willing to engage with the material on different terms but Allen's project seems to have been the result of a little too much glancing at his neighbor's work and we can't help but mark him down for it. This fact does not, however, take away from the considerable work from Blanchett's corner.
Playing an uppity socialite, Blanchett harnesses the manic hysterics of a character crippled by her own snobbish worldviews. Even though Allen has not put himself in front of the camera for much of his recent work, we all know that Allen still remains on the screen - just in another form. As Midnight in Paris injected star Owen Wilson with a more whimsical and charmed version of Allen, Blanchett's Jasmine is Allen's neurosis and angst cranked up until the dials break. She is a self-critical, self-loathing masochist, bottled up and shaken until she can't help but pop, lashing at the the world around her just for existing.
The Bronte Sisters
Just as Japan seeks to amend its pacifist constitution, along comes a film that shows it had a belligerent force after all, until 1969. That's when avant-garde artist Ushio Shinohara hit the New York art scene with his "box paintings" using aggression he'd soon extend -- emotionally -- to his future wife. Two decades his junior, Noriko was an art student whose career would derail as she became his de facto assistant, handmaiden and mother of his child.
"The average one has to help genius," Ushio crows in Zachary Heinzerling's documentary Cutie and the Boxer. Mick Jagger's Japanese look-alike may be full of himself, but his method of blamming paint-drenched boxing gloves against massive canvases will no doubt impress the viewer as well. Together with his whimsical cardboard sculptures, Ushio's scrappy brand of action painting earned him enfant terrible stardom in Japan and the New York of fan Andy Warhol. Yet this hasn't guaranteed fortune, and these days the octogenerian dukes it out with the household piggybank.
Not that he or Noriko could entertain a different way of making a living. "Art is a demon," says Ushio, fingering another antagonist in this bright-splatting non-fiction drama. Like love itself, art is a force to struggle against, yet ultimately worthy of big sacrifice.
The film, Heinzerling's first, allows viewers to burrow into the couple's Brooklyn life as they continue making a colorful mess of creative and romantic desire. "It's hard to be two flowers in one pot," says Noriko. " Sometimes it's hard to get enough nutrients."
Chronicling 40 years of marriage has given Noriko both the subject of her "Cutie" series and eventually the nerve to assert herself with imperious, acclaim-seeking Ushio. These days her cartoon-style drawings and water colors are garnering attention as aficionados follow Cutie and Bullie's gusty relationship like a soap opera. Time has done its work, and now Noriko's alter-ego is emboldened to subdue her pugnacious, once boozy spouse.
Yet for all her spoken and sketched barbs, the silver-pigtailed artist confesses her undying passion for Ushio. "Opposites attract -- similar personalities repel and break up."
Heinzerling has not simply documented the couple's partnership and work, he has retouched them with his own master strokes. Animations pulled from Noriko's images mix with archival news footage, home movies and five years of Heinzerling's intimate camerawork to yield a portrait of the artists that's as witty, poignant and entrancing as their creations themselves.